myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 3 July 2023)

Date	3 July 2023
Court	CFI
Division	Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Application for provisional measures
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_177/2023
Registry reference	ORD_541204/2023 · UPC_CFI177/2023
Parties	myStromer AG v. Revolt Zycling AG

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

22 June 2023 : myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_526778/2023, 22 June 2023) ACT_525740/2023 · ORD_526778/2023 · UPC_CFI177/2023
22 June 2023 : myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_525740/2023, 22 June 2023) ORD_525740/2023 · UPC_CFI177/2023
30 June 2023 : myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 30 June 2023) ORD_543068/2023 · UPC_CFI177/2023
18 October 2023 : myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 18 October 2023) App_552740/2023 · ORD_557761/2023 · UPC_CFI_177/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_177/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantmyStromer AG6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantRevolt Zycling AG6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

22 June 2023 myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_526778/2023, 22 June 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_177/2023
Revolt Zycling se voit interdire, sans audition préalable, l'offre et la commercialisation de la structure brevetée dans quatre États, sous astreinte et contre une garantie de 500 000 euros.
22 June 2023 myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_525740/2023, 22 June 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_177/2023
30 June 2023 myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 30 June 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_177/2023
L'omission de l'Autriche dans l'interdiction n'est pas une inexactitude manifeste : la demande de rectification au titre de la règle 353 est rejetée.
3 July 2023 myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 3 July 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_177/2023
18 October 2023 myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 18 October 2023) Generic application · UPC_CFI_177/2023
Revolt Zycling est condamnée à une astreinte de 26 500 euros pour trois violations fautives de l'interdiction prononcée le 22 juin 2023, le grief tiré de la lettre aux revendeurs belges est rejeté.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Application for provisional measures
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Les pièces ASt 12 et ASt 13 produites par myStromer le 1er juillet 2023 sont versées au dossier.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 2 546 134 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 18 October 2023) cited in this record
myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 30 June 2023) cited in this record
myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_526778/2023, 22 June 2023) cited in this record
myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_525740/2023, 22 June 2023) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 2 546 134`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 4 other decision(s): myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 22 November 2023) · myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 18 October 2023) · myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 30 June 2023) · myStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, ORD_526778/2023, 22 June 2023)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.