Motorola Mobility v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_27411/2024, 6 August 2024)
| Date | 6 August 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Amend Document |
| Registry reference | App_25265/2024 · ORD_27411/2024 |
| Parties | Motorola Mobility LLC |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 6 August 2024 (ORD_27411/2024, UPC_CFI_42/2024, ACT_5326/2024), the Munich Local Division refused Motorola Mobility leave to change its claims, in its action for infringement of EP 3 342 086 against Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson GmbH, so as to add an injunction (Art. 63 UPCA) and corrective measures of recall, definitive removal from the channels of commerce and destruction (Art. 64 UPCA). In the Division’s view, those claims could and should have been made by mid-February 2024 at the latest, leave to appeal was refused.
Question
Can a proprietor asserting a patent in a FRAND context add, while the action is pending, a claim for an injunction and corrective measures that it left out of its statement of claim because it did not want to alert the defendants prematurely?
Decision
No. Rule 263.2 RoP requires the claimant to show both that the amendment could not have been made earlier with reasonable diligence and that it will not unreasonably hinder the other party, the burden lying on the claimant (1). Motorola did not dispute the defendants’ submissions, in particular the injunction it had sought in the United Kingdom on 15 December 2023, so the relevant circumstances were known before the action was brought and nothing new had occurred since (2). The first condition was not met, which sufficed to reject the application. As the case was clear-cut, leave to appeal was not granted.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: in standard essential patent litigation, a proprietor contemplating an injunction should claim it in the statement of claim, a staggered approach to relief runs into Rule 263.2 RoP.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Arts. 63, 64(1) and (2)(b), (d) and (e) and 73(2)(b)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 220.2, 224.1(b) and 263
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantMotorola Mobility LLC19 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Amend Document
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- L'ajout tardif d'une demande d'injonction et de mesures correctives est refusé, Motorola n'ayant pas établi qu'elle ne pouvait les former plus tôt avec une diligence raisonnable.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 342 086mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 342 086 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 1 other decision(s): Motorola Mobility v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 6 September | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.