Malikie Innovations v Nintendo of Europe (CFI, 18 November 2024)
| Date | 18 November 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_59463/2024 · ORD_59817/2024 |
| Parties | Malikie Innovations Ltd. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 18 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_555/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division, in Malikie Innovations’ infringement action against Nintendo based on EP 2 579 551, replaced the designation « Nintendo of Europe AG » with « Nintendo of Europe SE », which had succeeded the former by universal succession. He refused to postpone the date of service to the date of rectification: the time limit for the statement of defence runs from 17 October 2024. The order shows that a corrected misdesignation does not reopen time limits where the addressee could not have been in doubt.
Question
May the claimant rectify an incorrect designation of the defendant and, if so, should service be deemed to have taken place on the date of rectification?
Decision
Following the Court of Appeal, rectification is allowed where the defendant is not unreasonably prejudiced, which is the case where it must have been clear that the claim was directed against it. The SE, the only company of that name in Germany, had taken over the assets, premises, email addresses and VAT number of the AG (paragraph 1). The statement of claim, posted by registered letter on 7 October 2024, is deemed served on the tenth day after posting under Rule 272.6(b) RoP, namely 17 October (not 20 October as erroneously stated in the order of 5 November), nothing justified another date, and the claimant had not agreed to an extension (paragraph 2).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: check the defendant’s corporate form in public registers before filing, if an error occurs, rectification remains available, but a defendant that was clearly targeted cannot rely on it to delay the start of its time limit.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rule 272.6(b)
- Case law cited
- Court of Appeal, 3 April 2024, UPC_CoA_433/2023, APL_588420/2023.
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantMalikie Innovations Ltd.5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La désignation de la défenderesse est rectifiée en Nintendo of Europe SE, successeur universel de l'AG, et la signification est réputée faite le 17 octobre 2024, point de départ du délai de défense.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 579 551mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 579 551 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Malikie Innovations v Nintendo (CFI, UPC_CFI_537/2024, 28 October 2025 · Malikie Innovations v Nintendo of Europe (CFI, 23 April 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.