Koninklijke Philips v S.G.E (CFI, 5 July 2023)

Date	5 July 2023
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_62/2023
Registry reference	ACT_463961/2023 · UPC_CFI_62/2023
Parties	Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. S.G.E.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

27 September 2023 : Koninklijke Philips v Edrich (CFI, 27 September 2023) ORD_576850/2023 · UPC_CFI_62/2023
3 January 2024 : Koninklijke Philips v Edrich (CFI, 3 January 2024) APP_598024/2023 · UPC_CFI_62/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_62/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantKoninklijke Philips N.V.28 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantS.G.EFollow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

5 July 2023 Koninklijke Philips v S.G.E (CFI, 5 July 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_62/2023
27 September 2023 Koninklijke Philips v Edrich (CFI, 27 September 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_62/2023
Le juge rapporteur valide au titre de la règle 275.2 les remises organisées par la demanderesse et la signification à un administrateur pour sa société, mais refuse le courriel adressé à la directrice juridique et la remise à un avocat non mandaté.
3 January 2024 Koninklijke Philips v Edrich (CFI, 3 January 2024) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_62/2023
La division locale de Munich proroge au 15 janvier 2024 le délai de réplique de Koninklijke Philips et réduit d'autant le délai de duplique sur la demande reconventionnelle en nullité.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Le juge rapporteur invite la demanderesse à remédier, dans cette procédure aussi, aux irrégularités de sa demande comme dans la pièce BP 8.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Koninklijke Philips v Edrich (CFI, 3 January 2024) cited in this record
Koninklijke Philips v Edrich (CFI, 27 September 2023) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.