Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 14 August 2023)
| Date | 14 August 2023 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application for provisional measures |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_249/2023 |
| Registry reference | ORD562104/2023 · UPC_CFI_249/2023 |
| Parties | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH, Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 28 August 2023 : Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 28 August 2023) ORD_567601/2023 · UPC_CFI_249/2023
- 19 December 2023 : Meril v Edwards Lifesciences (CFI, 19 December 2023) ORD_577734/2023 · UPC_CFI_249/2023
- 10 January 2025 : Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 10 January 2025) App_3187/2024 · ORD_4627/2024 · UPC_CFI_249/2023
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 14 August 2023 (UPC_CFI_249/2023, App_560315/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, in Edwards Lifesciences’ provisional measures proceedings against Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences based on EP 3 763 331, ruled that the application was deemed served on the second defendant on 7 August 2023 by alternative service (Rule 275.2 RoP). A CMS malfunction had prevented the defendants’ common counsel from accepting service for one of them.
Question
Can successful service on one defendant through the CMS (Rule 271.1(c) RoP) count as alternative service on another defendant represented by the same counsel, where only a technical incident prevented acceptance?
Decision
Counsel, who had filed a protective letter for both defendants and agreed in writing to electronic service on 7 August 2023, had known the content of the application since that date. The difficulties lay solely with the access codes generated by the CMS, and the defendants did not oppose the application (paragraphs 1 and 2). Rule 275.4 RoP does not stand in the way, as German law likewise cures defective service where the document was actually received (§ 189 ZPO) (paragraph 3). Service on the first defendant therefore counts as alternative service on the second (paragraph 4). The Registry was directed to issue a separate access code and record the date of service. Leave to appeal was refused, the application being unopposed (paragraph 6).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: where common counsel has actually received the document, a CMS incident need not delay the proceedings, an application under Rule 275.2 RoP allows the date of service to be fixed at the date of actual receipt.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 102, 205(a), 209.1(a), 220.2, 271.1(c), 275.2, 275.3(c), 275.4, 331.1 and 333
- Other provisions
- German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), § 189.
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Application for a preliminary injunction, Order to preserve evidence (UPC).
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: The Launch Letter: How Generics and Biosimilars Should Write to Avoid UPC Urgency (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantEdwards Lifesciences Corporation41 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantMeril GmbH45 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantMeril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.32 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 14 August 2023 Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 14 August 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_249/2023
- 28 August 2023 Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 28 August 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_249/2023
Une audience sur la demande de mesures provisoires est fixée au 10 octobre 2023, avec interprétation simultanée pour la formation, et les délais de réponse à l'opposition sont arrêtés.
- 19 December 2023 Meril v Edwards Lifesciences (CFI, 19 December 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_249/2023
La procédure de mesures provisoires est éteinte par l'engagement de cessation des défenderesses, qui supportent l'intégralité des frais dans la limite de 200 000 euros. L'appel est autorisé.
- 10 January 2025 Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 10 January 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_249/2023
Le juge rapporteur condamne Meril à rembourser 244 000 euros de frais à Edwards Lifesciences dans les 20 jours et rejette la demande d’intérêts, faute de base légale.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application for provisional measures
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La signification par le CMS à la première défenderesse vaut signification alternative à la seconde, réputée intervenue le 7 août 2023.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 763 331mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 10 January 2025) cited in this record
- Meril v Edwards Lifesciences (CFI, 19 December 2023) cited in this record
- Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 28 August 2023) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 763 331 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 5 other decision(s): Meril Life Sciences v Edwards Lifesciences (CoA, 4 October 2024) · Meril v Edwards Lifesciences (CoA, 15 February 2024) · Meril Life Sciences v Edwards Lifesciences (CoA, 18 January 2024) · Meril v Edwards Lifesciences (CFI, 19 December 2023) · Edwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 28 August 2023) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.