Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 1 May 2024)
| Date | 1 May 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Application Rop 333 |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CoA_183/2024 |
| Registry reference | App_23543/2024 · ORD_24731/2024 · UPC_CoA_183/2024 |
| Parties | Daedalus Prime LLC / vs. / Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH… |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantXiaomi Inc.28 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantXiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.21 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantXiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.32 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantXiaomi Technology Germany GmbH29 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantDaedalus Prime LLC8 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantvs2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application Rop 333
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La formation confirme l'ordonnance de la juge rapporteure refusant à Daedalus Prime la prorogation du délai de dépôt du mémoire exposant les motifs d'appel.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 792 100mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 792 100Method and device for secure communications over a network using a hardware security engine recorded proprietor: Intel Corp | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 9 other decision(s): Daedalus Prime v MediaTek (Headquarters) (CFI, 17 March 2025) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi Communications (CFI, 16 January 2025) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi Technology Netherlands (CoA, 8 January 2025) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi (CFI, 19 November 2024) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi Technology Netherlands (CFI, 11 October 2024) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi (CoA, 6 August 2024) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi Technology Netherlands (CFI, 25 July 2024) · Daedalus Prime v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 4 June 2024) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.