Chint New Energy Technology v JingAo Solar (CFI, 19 March 2025)
| Date | 19 March 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_54919/2024 · ORD_55185/2024 |
| Parties | Chint Solar Netherlands B.V. , Astronergy Europe GmbH , Astronergy Solarmodule GmbH , Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Astronergy Gmb… |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 19 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_425/2024, App_54919/2024), Judge-rapporteur Pichlmaier of the Munich Local Division ordered JingAo Solar, claimant in the infringement action on EP 2 787 541, to provide by 30 April 2025 security for costs of EUR 200,000 in favour of Chint New Energy Technology and the five other defendants, by a bank guarantee on first demand or by deposit into the UPC’s account. Failing that, a decision by default may be given (Rule 355).
Question
Does the claimant’s seat in China justify an order for security for costs?
Decision
A seat outside the EU and the EEA cannot in itself be decisive, as that would amount to a priori discrimination based on the nationality of the seat. Under the Court of Appeal’s case law (UPC_CoA_217/2024), there must be a legitimate and real concern that a costs order may not be enforceable, or only in an unduly burdensome way. Although China has ratified the Hague Service Convention, service requests are often not forwarded or are returned, as has happened before the UPC itself (UPC_CFI_332/2024, UPC_CFI_508/2023 and UPC_CFI_509/2023). For a state that fails to meet its Convention obligations, it must be assumed that a UPC costs order would be unenforceable or enforceable only with undue difficulty. The amount reflects the costs recoverable for a value in dispute of up to EUR 2 million.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: a defendant seeking security against a Chinese claimant should document concrete difficulties of service and enforcement in China rather than rely on the seat alone.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Arts 69(4) and 73
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 158, 220.2 and 355
- Other provisions
- Hague Service Convention
- Case law cited
- Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_217/2024, Mannheim Local Division, UPC_CFI_332/2024, UPC_CFI_508/2023 and UPC_CFI_509/2023
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantAstronergy Solarmodule GmbH2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantChint Solar Netherlands B.V.3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantAstronergy Europe GmbH4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantChint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantAstronergy GmbFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- JingAo Solar doit fournir une garantie pour frais de 200 000 euros avant le 30 avril 2025, l'exécution en Chine d'une décision de la JUB sur les frais étant présumée impossible ou excessivement difficile.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 787 541mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- JingAo Solar v Chint New Energy Technology (CFI, 9 May 2025) cites this decision
- JingAo Solar v Chint New Energy (CFI, 28 November 2025) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 787 541 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 4 other decision(s): JingAo Solar v Chint New Energy (CFI, 28 November 2025) · Chint New Energy v JingAo Solar (CoA, 9 July 2025) · Chint New Energy v JingAo Solar (CoA, 20 May 2025) · JingAo Solar v Chint New Energy Technology (CFI, 31 March 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.