Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 30 April 2024)
| Date | 30 April 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
| Type of action | Application Rop 333 |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_263/2023 |
| Registry reference | App_20743/2024 · ORD_24607/2024 · UPC_CFI_263/2023 |
| Parties | Carrier Corporation v. BITZER Electronics A/S |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 8 January 2024 : Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 8 January 2024) ORD_591040/2023 · UPC_CFI_263/2023
- 5 April 2024 : BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 5 April 2024) ORD_598263/2023 · UPC_CFI_263/2023
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By an order of 30 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_263/2023, ACT_555899/2023, App_20743/2024), the Paris Central Division (F. Thomas, P. Catallozzi, U. Keltsch), on Carrier Corporation’s application for panel review under Rule 333 RoP, partly set aside the judge-rapporteur’s order of 5 April 2024 and held inadmissible the application to amend EP 3 414 708 insofar as it concerned claims other than claim 1, the only claim attacked by BITZER Electronics A/S. The order confines amendment of the patent to the scope of the revocation action.
Question
In a revocation action limited to claim 1, may the proprietor propose amendments to claims that are not challenged?
Decision
The panel ruled without waiting for the oral hearing, since Carrier had an interest in an early decision in order to organise its defence (paragraphs 9 to 11 and 28). Amendment is a means of defence against the revocation claim and cannot go further than answering that claim requires (paragraphs 18 to 20). The proprietor cannot obtain a general ruling on validity, and the court, bound by the subject matter of the dispute, does not act of its own motion (paragraphs 21 to 23). EPO practice, that of an administrative body rather than an adversarial court, is no valid comparison (paragraph 24). The limit serves the speed sought by the UPCA, while the proprietor remains free to amend its patent before the EPO (paragraphs 25 to 27).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: in a partial revocation action, auxiliary requests must be confined to the challenged claims, amending other claims is a matter for limitation proceedings before the EPO.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 24
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 30, 50, 105.5, 333 and 334(d)
- European Patent Convention
- Art. 84, 123(2) and (3), 138(3)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantBITZER Electronics A/S6 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantCarrier Corporation6 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 8 January 2024 Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 8 January 2024) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_263/2023
Le sursis à statuer sur l'action en nullité est refusé faute de preuve qu'une décision de l'OEB sur l'opposition est imminente. L'appel est autorisé.
- 5 April 2024 BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 5 April 2024) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_263/2023
Les attaques en nouveauté tardives fondées sur MB5 et MB6 sont écartées, le défaut de droit de priorité et l'insuffisance de description visant la version modifiée restant dans le débat. Valeur fixée à 250 000 euros.
- 30 April 2024 Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 30 April 2024) Application Rop 333 · UPC_CFI_263/2023
- 28 May 2024 Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CoA, 28 May 2024) Appeal RoP220.2 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
La JUB ne sursoit en principe pas à statuer en raison d'une opposition parallèle. Faute de décision rapide attendue de l'OEB, le refus de sursis est confirmé et l'appel rejeté.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application Rop 333
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La demande de modification du brevet est irrecevable pour les revendications autres que la revendication 1, seule visée par l'action en nullité.
- Appeal
- An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 414 708mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 5 April 2024) cited in this record
- Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 8 January 2024) cited in this record
- BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 29 July 2024) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 414 708Adaptive sensor sampling of a cold chain distribution system recorded proprietor: Carrier Corp | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 7 other decision(s): BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 29 July 2024) · Mathys & Squire LLP v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 29 July 2024) · Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CoA, 28 May 2024) · BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 5 April 2024) · BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 6 March 2024) · Carrier v BITZER Electronics (CFI, 8 January 2024) · BITZER Electronics v Carrier (CFI, 5 July 2023) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.