BTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, 16 January 2026)
| Date | 16 January 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | The Hague (NL) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_1048/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC-CFI-1048/2025 |
| Parties | BTL Medizintechnik GmbH v. Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems S.L. |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 13 August 2026 : BTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, 13 August 2026) UPC-CFI-0001048/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantBTL Medizintechnik GmbH3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantLexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems S.L3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 16 January 2026 BTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, 16 January 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_1048/2025
- 13 August 2026 BTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, 13 August 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_1048/2025
La division locale de La Haye déclare irrecevable la demande de remboursement des frais de justice déposée après la clôture de l’affaire, sans demande de réouverture, et autorise l’appel.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le désistement de l'action en contrefaçon, consenti par la défenderesse après transaction, est autorisé et la procédure est déclarée close, sans décision sur les frais.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 4 146 335mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- BTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, 13 August 2026) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 4 146 335 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 1 other decision(s): BTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.