Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 5 May 2026)
| Date | 5 May 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application for provisional measures |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_1881/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_1881/2025 |
| Parties | Brita SE v. Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance Co. Ltd. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 9 December 2025 : Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 9 December 2025) UPC_CFI_1881/2025
- 15 July 2026 : Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 15 July 2026) UPC-CFI-0001881/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In an order of 5 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_1881/2025), the Hamburg Local Division orders Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance, which failed to comply with the information obligation in the provisional measures order of 9 December 2025 obtained by Brita (EP 2 131 940 B1), to pay a penalty of EUR 1,000 per day since 31 March 2026, and threatens a further penalty of EUR 1,500 per day for non-compliance after 5 May 2026. The order recalls that a penalty may be imposed only up to the amount previously announced, including in provisional measures proceedings.
Question
On what conditions and to what extent can a penalty be imposed (Rule 354.3 RoP) for failure to comply with an information obligation ordered on a provisional basis?
Decision
Imposing a penalty requires a prior threat, even though the first sentence of Rule 118.8 RoP does not apply to provisional measures. The order of 9 December 2025 contained none, the threat was made on 17 March 2026, at EUR 1,000 per day. Non-compliance is presumed culpable, and the length of the delay and the lack of cooperation justify that maximum. A step-up to EUR 1,500 per day can be ordered only after a fresh threat, and any future increase requires a new application. The respondent bears 90% of the costs, the value of the proceedings is set at EUR 50,000.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: ask in the application for provisional measures that the order itself provide for penalties, otherwise a separate threat must precede any imposition, and each step-up must be announced in advance.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 118.8, 354.3 and 354.4
- Case law cited
- Belkin v Philips, Court of Appeal, 30 May 2025, Kodak v Fujifilm, Court of Appeal, 14 October 2025
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Application for a preliminary injunction, Order to preserve evidence (UPC).
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: The Launch Letter: How Generics and Biosimilars Should Write to Avoid UPC Urgency (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantBrita SE8 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantNingbo Blue Pluser Appliance Co. Ltd.3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 9 December 2025 Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 9 December 2025) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_1881/2025
La division locale de Hambourg interdit au fabricant chinois, sans l'avoir entendu, la commercialisation des cartouches contrefaisantes dans quatorze États, ordonne leur remise et une information, sans garantie de Brita.
- 5 May 2026 Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 5 May 2026) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_1881/2025
- 15 July 2026 Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 15 July 2026) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_1881/2025
Des astreintes de 97 500 euros (violation de l'interdiction par publicité en ligne) et de 105 000 euros (défaut d'information) sont infligées, et une astreinte de 2 000 euros par jour est annoncée pour l'avenir.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application for provisional measures
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La défenderesse doit une astreinte de 1 000 euros par jour depuis le 31 mars 2026 et se voit menacée d'une astreinte supplémentaire de 1 500 euros par jour, le surplus de la demande est rejeté.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 131 940mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 15 July 2026) cited in this record
- Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 9 December 2025) cited in this record
- Kodak v Fujifilm (CoA, 14 October 2025) cited in this record
- Belkin v Koninklijke Philips (CoA, 30 May 2025) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 131 940 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 3 other decision(s): Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 15 July 2026) · Brita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 9 December 2025) · Brita v Fileder Filter Systems Spolka (CFI, 6 November 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.