Boa v FLA Europe (CFI, 17 August 2026)

Date	17 August 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_996/2025
Registry reference	UPC-CFI-0000996/2025
Parties	Boa Technology Inc. v. FLA Europe NV, Shinkyung Inc.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

1 June 2026 : Boa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 1 June 2026) UPC_CFI_996/2025
15 July 2026 : Boa v FLA Europe (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 15 July 2026) UPC-CFI-0000996/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_996/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantBoa Technology Inc.6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantFLA Europe NV3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantShinkyung Inc.3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

1 June 2026 Boa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 1 June 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_996/2025
La demande de garantie pour les frais est rejetée, la situation financière de la société holding du demandeur étant indifférente.
15 July 2026 Boa v FLA Europe (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 15 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_996/2025
Le délai de dépôt des écritures non signées est prorogé rétroactivement au 13 juillet 2026 et leur date de dépôt du 4 mai 2026 est conservée.
17 August 2026 Boa v FLA Europe (CFI, 17 August 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_996/2025

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Le juge rapporteur admet provisoirement les requêtes subsidiaires 1bis à 12bis, renvoie l’examen de la demande fondée sur la règle 30.2 au fond et accorde un délai supplémentaire aux défenderesses.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 003 087 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Boa v FLA Europe (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 15 July 2026) cited in this record
Boa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 1 June 2026) cited in this record
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare v Flexicare (Group) (CFI, UPC_CFI_480/2025, 15 January 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 003 087`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Boa v FLA Europe (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 15 July 2026) · Boa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 1 June 2026)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.