Opens in a new tab

DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 6 August 2025)

Date6 August 2025
CourtCFI
DivisionMannheim (DE) Local Division
Type of actionGeneric application
Registry referenceApp_66435/2024 · ORD_66571/2024
PartiesAYLO PREMIUM LTD, BRIDGEMAZE GROUP LLC, BROCKWELL GROUP LLC, AYLO BILLING US CORP., AYLO FREESITES LTD, AYLO Billing Limited

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

By order of 6 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_471/2023, ACT_594191/2023, App_66435/2024), the judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (Judge Böttcher) dismissed the AYLO defendants’ application to fix the lawyers’ fees incurred in responding to the appeal, eventually withdrawn, that DISH Technologies and Sling TV had brought against a security for costs order. The order sets a useful timing rule: the costs of a procedural incident are not assessed separately.

Question

Can costs incurred in connection with a procedural order, such as an order for security under Rule 158 RoP, be fixed in separate proceedings before the decision on the merits?

Decision

The application is inadmissible: the Rules of Procedure provide for costs to be fixed after the decision on the merits and, where relevant, the decision on damages, an early partial application under Rule 150 RoP is inconsistent with that scheme and would fragment the proceedings. In the alternative, it has become moot: the merits decision of 6 June 2025 dealt with costs globally (court fees for the infringement action borne by the claimants, those for the counterclaim by the defendants, each party bearing its own extrajudicial costs, paragraph 174 of that decision), as Art. 69 UPCA and Rule 118.5 RoP allow, with no need to apportion the costs of each incident.

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
Art. 69(1) to (3)
Rules of Procedure
Rules 9.1, 118.5, 150, 157, 158, 221.1 and 265.2
Case law cited
DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM, Mannheim Local Division, 6 June 2025, decision on the merits, paragraph 174.

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Going further

Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

No case number recorded in this record.

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Generic application
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La demande de fixation séparée des frais exposés dans un appel contre une ordonnance de garantie est irrecevable et, subsidiairement, sans objet après la décision globale sur les frais.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.