Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 4 October 2023)
| Date | 4 October 2023 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_54/2023 |
| Registry reference | ORD_577763/2023 · UPC_CFI_54/2023 |
| Parties | Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v. Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE/Tesla Germany GmbH |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 22 August 2023 : Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 22 August 2023) ORD_560542/2023 · UPC_CFI_54/2023
- 3 November 2023 : Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 November 2023) ORD_577703/2023 · UPC_CFI_54/2023
- 28 November 2023 : Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 28 November 2023) ORD_589355/2023 · UPC_CFI_54/2023
- 5 December 2023 : Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 5 December 2023) ORD_589355/2023 · UPC_CFI_54/2023
- 26 August 2024 : Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 26 August 2024) ACT_463258/2023 · ORD_598391/2023 · UPC_CFI_54/2023
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 4 October 2023 (UPC_CFI_54/2023, ACT_463258/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division, on a Rule 262A RoP application by Tesla Germany and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg in the infringement action brought by Avago Technologies International Sales on EP 1612910, provisionally restricted access to the confidential versions of the statement of defence and Exhibits B2 and B4 to the claimant’s representative alone, who is bound to confidentiality even towards his own client, until a final order is made.
Question
May the court provisionally restrict access to confidential information to the opposing party’s representative alone, before hearing that party as Rule 262A.4 RoP requires?
Decision
Art. 9(1) and (2)(a) of Directive (EU) 2016/943, implemented by Rule 262A RoP, allows access to documents containing alleged trade secrets to be limited to a small number of persons. The duty to hear the other party applies only to the final order: in the meantime, access may be narrowed further to the representative alone, since the redacted versions allow the application to be discussed with the claimant. The claimant has two weeks to comment and to name up to three employees to be given access to the confidential versions. The defendants may reply within ten days. Without deciding the point, the judge noted that the product-specific design, chip purchase prices and sales forecasts are probably trade secrets, and that the treatment of Exhibit B4, already disclosed to the claimant, depends on the circumstances of that disclosure.
Key points for practice
- A provisional « representative only » order may be made as soon as a Rule 262A application is filed, before the other side has commented.
- Practical point: the applicant should file redacted versions and identify precisely the passages and categories of secrets relied on.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 24(1)(a)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 262A.1, 262A.4, 331.1, 334 and 335
- Other provisions
- Directive (EU) 2016/943 on the protection of trade secrets, Arts 2(1) and 9(1) and (2)(a)
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Patent infringement action.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantAvago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited28 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantTesla Germany GmbH16 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantTesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE15 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 22 August 2023 Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 22 August 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_54/2023
Le juge rapporteur rejette la demande de prorogation du délai de défense, la coordination avec des fournisseurs non européens et les congés n'étant pas des motifs suffisants.
- 4 October 2023 Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 4 October 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_54/2023
- 3 November 2023 Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 November 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_54/2023
La mise en œuvre technique du mode de réalisation litigieux et les prix d'achat des composants sont protégés comme secrets d'affaires, l'accès étant réservé aux avocats et à trois personnes désignées. La protection est refusée pour une lettre déjà communiquée sans réserve et pour des prévisions issues de données publiq…
- 28 November 2023 Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 28 November 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_54/2023
Le délai de réplique court du 8 novembre 2023, date de clôture de la procédure de confidentialité sur le mémoire en défense. Les défenderesses sont invitées à se prononcer sur la prorogation du délai de réponse à la demande reconventionnelle.
- 5 December 2023 Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 5 December 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_54/2023
Le délai de réponse à la demande reconventionnelle en nullité court, comme le délai de réplique, du 8 novembre 2023, date de clôture de la procédure de confidentialité sur le mémoire en défense.
- 26 August 2024 Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 26 August 2024) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_54/2023
L’action en contrefaçon est rejetée, Avago n’établissant pas que Tesla reproduit la caractéristique d’arbitrage de la revendication 1 maintenue, la demande reconventionnelle est partiellement accueillie : le brevet est annulé au-delà de la revendication 1 dans la version de la requête subsidiaire 1, la revendication 3 …
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur réserve provisoirement l'accès aux versions confidentielles du mémoire en défense et de deux pièces au seul représentant de la demanderesse, jusqu'à l'ordonnance définitive de confidentialité.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 612 910mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 26 August 2024) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 5 December 2023) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 28 November 2023) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 November 2023) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 22 August 2023) cited in this record
- Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K. (CFI, 17 November 2023) cites this decision
Patents and standards
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.