Opens in a new tab

Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K. (CFI, 18 March 2024)

Date18 March 2024
CourtCFI
DivisionMunich (DE) Central Division - Section
Type of actionRevocation Action
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_75/2023
Registry referenceACT_464985/2023 · ORD_598255/2023 · UPC_CFI_75/2023
PartiesASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v. Healios K.K, Riken, Osaka University

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

By an order of 18 March 2024 following the interim conference (UPC_CFI_75/2023, ACT_464985/2023, order no. 598255), the judge-rapporteur of panel 1 of the Munich Central Division (A. Kupecz), in the revocation action on EP 3 056 563 brought by Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine against Healios K.K., Riken and Osaka University, admitted document D18, set the value of the proceedings at EUR 4,000,000 for the scale of ceilings on recoverable costs and confirmed the oral hearing for 25 June 2024.

Question

How does the judge-rapporteur deal, at the close of the interim conference, with the admission of a late document, the value of the proceedings and the timetable for costs submissions?

Decision

Document D18 was admitted, on condition that the Defendant may file a succinct reply, possibly with a short reply expert report, by 11 April 2024, strictly limited to the points raised. After discussion with the parties, the value of the proceedings was set at EUR 4,000,000 (Rule 104(j) in connection with Rule 152.3 RoP). The Administrative Committee’s scale sets a ceiling of EUR 400,000 for that value. The judge-rapporteur noted that the scale sets a ceiling on recoverable costs rather than an amount owed, that under Art. 69 UPCA reasonable and proportionate costs are borne by the unsuccessful party, and that the Court will in principle respect an agreement between the parties on their amount. Costs exhibits may be filed until 11 June 2024, with an update by noon CET on 24 June 2024.

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
Art. 69
Rules of Procedure
Rules 9, 28, 104(j), 105.1, 105.5, 106, 108, 152.3 and 333

Related decisions

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: Revocation action.

Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: G 1/25, Take Three: Anything You Leave in the Description May Be Used Against You (Kluwer Patent Blog).

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_75/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 21 September 2023 Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, 21 September 2023) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_75/2023

    La demande d'accès d'un tiers au mémoire introductif et à la lettre de signification est rejetée : l'éducation et la formation ne sont pas un motif légitime, et la lettre n'est ni une écriture ni une pièce.

  2. 11 October 2023 Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, UPC_CFI_75/2023, 11 October 2023) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_75/2023

    Le mémoire en défense à l'action en nullité est réputé signifié le 29 septembre 2023, la notification générée par le CMS valant signification au sens de la règle 278.1.

  3. 28 December 2023 Mathys & Squire v Astellas (CFI, 28 December 2023) Application RoP262.1 (b) · UPC_CFI_75/2023

    La demande d'accès de Mathys & Squire est mise en attente jusqu'à la décision de la cour d'appel sur la règle 262.1 b), à produire dans les trois semaines.

  4. 18 March 2024 Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K. (CFI, 18 March 2024) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_75/2023
  5. 22 August 2024 Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, 22 August 2024) Application RoP262.1 (b) · UPC_CFI_75/2023

    Mathys & Squire obtient l'accès aux écritures et pièces de l'action en nullité close par transaction, après occultation des données personnelles et des informations confidentielles d'Astellas. L'appel est autorisé.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Revocation Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
Le document D18 est admis sous réserve d'une réponse de la défenderesse avant le 11 avril 2024, la valeur du litige est fixée à 4 000 000 euros et l'audience confirmée au 25 juin 2024.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 3 056 563
Method of producing retinal pigment epithelial cell
recorded proprietor: Healios KK, RIKEN et University of Osaka NUC
Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 7 other decision(s): Mathys & Squire v Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CFI, 4 · Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, 22 Au · Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, 23 Ju · Mathys & Squire v Astellas (CFI, 28 December 2023) · Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, UPC_C · Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K (CFI, 21 Se · Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v Healios K.K. (CFI, ORD_
not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet · European Patent Register
existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically)
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.