Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 13 August 2025)
| Date | 13 August 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | The Hague (NL) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_34218/2025 · ORD_34254/2025 |
| Parties | Arbutus Biopharma Corporation |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By procedural order of 13 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_191/2025, App_34218/2025 and App_34202/2025), the judge rapporteur of The Hague Local Division partly granted the applications by Genevant Sciences and Arbutus Biopharma for an extension of time in their action for infringement of EP 2 279 254 against fifteen Moderna group companies, which have counterclaimed for revocation. The time limit for the Reply and the Defence to the counterclaim was extended to 24 September 2025, rather than 4 October as requested. The order fixes the starting point of the period where access to confidential material was delayed.
Question
Does delayed access to the defendant’s confidential pleadings justify extending the time limit for the Reply and, if so, from what date?
Decision
The power to extend a time limit under Rule 9.3(a) RoP is construed narrowly: an extension requires exceptional circumstances and is limited to the additional time needed, after weighing the right to a fair hearing against the efficiency of the proceedings (paragraphs 18 and 19). The judge took as the starting point of the two-month period the upload of the confidentiality club agreement on 24 July 2025. He refused to go further: the defendants’ own request for an extension of their defence had largely been refused, the corrected counterclaim was served on 15 July, the claimants had the redacted versions, the confidential part was minor, their representatives had access from 17 and 18 July and the interim conferences in February and May 2026 would have been affected (paragraph 21).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: where access to confidential material is delayed, the period for the Reply may be recalculated from the date on which the confidentiality club is actually in place, but seldom beyond that.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 9.3(a), 29(a), 262A and 333
- Case law cited
- Roche Diabetes Care, Paris Central Division, 20 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_454/2023), Munich Local Division, 9 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_501/2023), Düsseldorf Local Division, 20 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_355/2023), Paris Central Division, 17 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_189/2024), Mannheim Local Division, 16 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_750/2024), Avago International Sales v Tesla, Hamburg Local Division, 28 November 2023 and 5 December 2023 (UPC_CFI_54/2023), Düsseldorf Local Division, 24 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_456/2023), Mannheim Local Division, 9 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_219/2023 and 223/2023), Düsseldorf Local Division, 23 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_463/2023)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Supplementary protection certificate (SPC), Biosimilar medicinal product, Launch at risk.
Dhenne Avocats blog: Pharmaceutical patents and the UPC: is the Court hostile to them?.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: The Launch Letter: How Generics and Biosimilars Should Write to Avoid UPC Urgency (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantArbutus Biopharma Corporation6 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La demande est partiellement rejetée : le délai de la réplique et de la défense à la demande reconventionnelle est fixé au 24 septembre 2025, deux mois après le dépôt de l'accord de cercle de confidentialité.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 279 254mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_191/2025, 25 August 2026) cited in this record
- Tandem Diabetes Care v Roche Diabetes Care (CFI, ORD_9060/2024, 20 February 2024) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 5 December 2023) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 28 November 2023) cited in this record
- TCL Europe v Corning (CFI, 8 September 2025) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 279 254Novel lipid formulations for nucleic acid delivery recorded proprietor: Arbutus Biopharma Corp | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 7 other decision(s): Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_191/2025, 25 August 2026) · Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 18 August 2025) · Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 4 August 2025) · Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 12 June 2025) · Moderna v Genevant Sciences (CFI, 4 June 2025) · Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 23 May 2025) · Genevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 17 April 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.