Amycell v *** (CFI, 1 April 2025)
| Date | 1 April 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | The Hague (NL) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_499/2024 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_499/2024 |
| Parties | Amycell LLC v. *** |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 21 October 2025 : Amycel v XXX (CFI, 21 October 2025) UPC_CFI_499/2024
- 9 December 2025 : Amycell v *** (CFI, 9 December 2025) UPC_CFI_499/2024
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantAmycell LLC2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 1 April 2025 Amycell v *** (CFI, 1 April 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_499/2024
- 21 October 2025 Amycel v XXX (CFI, 21 October 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_499/2024
Le mémoire en défense étant réputé non déposé, la division rend une décision par défaut qui interdit la souche Cayene dans quatre États, ordonne des mesures correctives et alloue 50 000 euros de dommages et intérêts provisionnels.
- 9 December 2025 Amycell v *** (CFI, 9 December 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_499/2024
La demande d'annulation de la décision par défaut du 21 octobre 2025 est irrecevable, et subsidiairement rejetée, le défendeur ayant été averti du caractère définitif de cette décision. L'indication des voies de recours est rectifiée au profit de l'appel.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Amycell v *** (CFI, 9 December 2025) cited in this record
- Amycel v XXX (CFI, 21 October 2025) cited in this record
- Amycel v *** (CFI, 1 April 2025) cited in this record
- Lionra Technologies v Cisco Systems (CFI, 2 June 2025) cites this decision
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.