Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Application Rop313" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
8 decisions recorded
By order of 23 September 2025 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_631/2025 and UPC_CoA_632/2025, the Court of Appeal admits Apple as an intervener in support of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson.
Read the analysisBy order of 23 September 2025 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_755/2025 and UPC_CoA_757/2025, the Court of Appeal admits Apple as an intervener in support of SUN PATENT Trust, to the extent that Apple’s confidential information is concerned.
Read the analysisBy an order of 21 August 2025 (UPC_CoA_23/2025, App_33358/2025), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, presiding, Gougé, rapporteur, and Blok) allowed the withdrawal of the application to intervene lodged by LIFE 365 and LIFE 365 Italy in support of LAMA France in…
Read the analysisIn SWARCO FUTURIT's action against Yunex for infringement of EP 2 643 717, the judge rapporteur of the Munich Local Division admitted, absent any objection, Shenzhen Dianming's intervention in support of the defendant (Rule 313), declared the invitation to intervene of 24…
Read the analysisBy order of 27 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_698/2024, ORD_10348/2025), the Milan Central Division (Judges Postiglione, presiding and rapporteur, Knijff and Werner, technically qualified) dismissed the application by ZENTIVA K.S.
Read the analysisBy an order of 8 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_621/2024), the Court of Appeal (panel 1a) granted MediaTek leave to intervene in support of Xiaomi in Daedalus Prime's appeal against a Hamburg Local Division order on access by its US attorneys to confidential information…
Read the analysis