Application Rop 360

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Application Rop 360" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

  1. 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
  2. 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
  3. 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

3 decisions recorded

Hypertherm v Tec.Mo (CFI, 7 October 2025)

7 October 2025 CFI / Milan (IT) Local Division / Application Rop 360 Decision with commentary

In an order of 7 October 2025, the Milan Local Division, on the parties' joint request, found that Hypertherm's infringement action against Tec.Mo. (UPC_CFI_226/2025) had become devoid of purpose following a settlement, held that there was no need to adjudicate and closed…

Read the analysis

Faro Technologies v PMT Technologies (Suzhou) (CFI, 29 August 2025)

29 August 2025 CFI / Mannheim (DE) Local Division / Application Rop 360 Decision with commentary

By an order of 29 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_500/2025, ORD_33879/2025), the Mannheim Local Division declared terminated, following Blankenhorn's cease-and-desist undertaking and nil disclosure, the provisional measures proceedings Faro Technologies had brought against it on EP 4 001 835, and ordered it to bear…

Read the analysis