SprintRay (CFI, 26 August 2026)

Date	26 August 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat
Type of action	Declaration of Non-Infringement
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_2034/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_2034/2025
Parties	SprintRay Inc. / v / ***

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

11 September 2026 : SprintRay v Name not displayed for GDPR re (CFI, 11 September 2026) UPC-CFI-0002034/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_2034/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantSprintRay Inc.6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantv14 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

26 August 2026 SprintRay (CFI, 26 August 2026) Declaration of Non-Infringement · UPC_CFI_2034/2025
11 September 2026 SprintRay v Name not displayed for GDPR re (CFI, 11 September 2026) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_2034/2025
21 October 2026 Name not displayed (GDPR) v SprintRay (CoA, 21 October 2026) Appeal · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
La juge permanente de la cour d'appel déclare irrecevables les appels formés directement contre l'ordonnance du président de la division centrale refusant le passage à l'anglais, cette ordonnance de procédure devant d'abord être soumise au panel en application de la règle 333.1, nonobstant l'autorisation d'appel donnée…

What the record states

Nature of the act: Declaration of Non-Infringement
Appeal: An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

SprintRay v Name not displayed for GDPR re (CFI, 11 September 2026) cited in this record
SprintRay v *** (CFI, 26 August 2026) cited in this record
Name not displayed (GDPR) v SprintRay (CoA, 21 October 2026) cites this decision

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.