Plant-e v Arkyne (CFI, 4 March 2024)
| Date | 4 March 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | The Hague (NL) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application RoP262A |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_239/2023 |
| Registry reference | ORD_590350/2023 · ACT_549536/2023 · UPC_CFI_239/2023 |
| Parties | Plant-e, Plant-e Knowledge v. Arkyne Technologies S.L. |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 3 August 2023 : Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 3 August 2023) ORD_555528/2023 · UPC_CFI_239/2023
- 18 October 2023 : Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 18 October 2023) ORD_581189/2023 · UPC_CFI_239/2023
- 17 January 2024 : Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 17 January 2024) ORD_2223/2024 · UPC_CFI_239/2023
- 13 February 2024 : Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 13 February 2024) App_586761/2023 · ORD_586897/2023 · UPC_CFI_239/2023
- 15 February 2024 : Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 15 February 2024) ORD_8243/2024 · UPC_CFI_239/2023
- 4 March 2024 : Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 4 March 2024) ACT_549536/2023 · ORD_590350/2023 · UPC_CFI_239/2023
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantArkyne Technologies S.L12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantPlant-e4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantPlant-e Knowledge4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 3 August 2023 Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 3 August 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_239/2023
Le juge dispense les demanderesses de traduire en néerlandais, langue de la procédure, les pièces rédigées en anglais, aucun intérêt du défendeur à une traduction n'apparaissant.
- 18 October 2023 Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 18 October 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_239/2023
La présidente du tribunal de première instance remplace le néerlandais par l'anglais, langue de délivrance, à la demande du défendeur, la demande présentée avant le mémoire en défense étant recevable et l'équité commandant le changement.
- 17 January 2024 Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 17 January 2024) Procedural Order · UPC_CFI_239/2023
Le délai de la règle 29 a) court de la signification du mémoire en défense contenant la demande reconventionnelle, mais il est prorogé au 23 janvier 2024 en raison de la confusion créée par le CMS.
- 13 February 2024 Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 13 February 2024) Generic application · UPC_CFI_239/2023
La division locale de La Haye rejette la demande de garantie des frais de 200 000 euros, les demanderesses étant établies aux Pays-Bas et aucune circonstance exceptionnelle n'étant établie, et autorise l'appel.
- 15 February 2024 Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 15 February 2024) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_239/2023
La division locale de La Haye décide, à la demande des deux parties et avant la clôture de la procédure écrite, d'instruire ensemble l'action en contrefaçon et la demande reconventionnelle en nullité.
- 4 March 2024 Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 4 March 2024) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_239/2023
Les informations financières de Plant-e sont confidentielles au sens de l'article 58 de l'Accord et de la règle 262A, seuls les représentants de la défenderesse y ont accès, pour la seule demande de garantie des frais.
- 4 March 2024 Plant-e v Arkyne (CFI, 4 March 2024) Application RoP262A · UPC_CFI_239/2023
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application RoP262A
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 22 November 2024) cited in this record
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 4 March 2024) cited in this record
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 15 February 2024) cited in this record
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 13 February 2024) cited in this record
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 17 January 2024) cited in this record
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 18 October 2023) cited in this record
- Plant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 3 August 2023) cited in this record
- LAMA FRANCE v HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (CFI, 19 December 2024) cites this decision
- 10x Genomics v Vizgen (CFI, ORD_49363/2024, 24 October 2024) cites this decision
- CEAD v BEGO Medical (CFI, 30 July 2024) cites this decision
- NOVAWELL v C-KORE SYSTEMS (CFI, 26 March 2024) cites this decision
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.