Philips IP Ventures v Edrich (CFI, 3 January 2024)

Date	3 January 2024
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_5/2023
Registry reference	App_598021/2023 · UPC_CFI_5/2023
Parties	Philips IP Ventures B.V. v. Edrich u.a.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

27 September 2023 : Philips IP Ventures v Edrich (CFI, 27 September 2023) ORD_576855/2023 · UPC_CFI_5/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_5/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantPhilips IP Ventures B.V.3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantEdrich u.a4 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

27 September 2023 Philips IP Ventures v Edrich (CFI, 27 September 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_5/2023
Le juge rapporteur valide au titre de la règle 275.2 la signification par agent enregistré, coursier et voie postale organisée par la demanderesse, ainsi que la signification à un administrateur pour sa société, mais refuse le courriel du greffe et la remise à un avocat non mandaté.
3 January 2024 Philips IP Ventures v Edrich (CFI, 3 January 2024) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_5/2023

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La division locale de Munich proroge au 15 janvier 2024 le délai de réplique de Philips IP Ventures et réduit d'autant le délai de duplique sur la demande reconventionnelle en nullité.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 2 372 863 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Philips IP Ventures v Edrich (CFI, 27 September 2023) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 2 372 863`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 1 other decision(s): Philips IP Ventures v Stephen George Edrich (CFI, 9 September 2024)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.