Network System v Qualcomm (CFI, UPC_CFI_65/2024, 11 March 2026)

Date	11 March 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_65/2024
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_65/2024
Parties	Network System Technologies LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated a.o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_65/2024 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantNetwork System Technologies LLC43 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantQualcomm Incorporated a.o6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

11 March 2026 Network System v Qualcomm (CFI, UPC_CFI_65/2024, 11 March 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_65/2024
9 October 2026 Network System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_71/2026, 9 October 2026) Appeal · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
La cour d’appel déclare recevables mais mal fondées les demandes de restitutio in integrum de Network System Technologies, faute pour elle d’avoir fait preuve de toute la vigilance requise.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Appeal: An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Network System Technologies v Qualcomm (CFI, UPC_CFI_451/2024, 11 March 2026) cited in this record
Network System Technologies v Qualcomm (CFI, UPC_CFI_64/2024, 11 March 2026) cites this decision
Network System v Qualcomm (CFI, UPC_CFI_63/2024, 11 March 2026) cites this decision

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.