LiNA Medical v Schultz Medical (UK) (CFI, 19 December 2025)
| Date | 19 December 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_1598/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_1598/2025 |
| Parties | LiNA Medical AG v. Schultz Medical (UK) Ltd. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 18 November 2025 : LiNA Medical v Schultz Medical (UK) (CFI, 18 November 2025) UPC_CFI_1598/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 19 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_1598/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered full disclosure to LiNA Medical and its representatives of the expert’s detailed description following evidence preservation and inspection measures carried out at Schultz Medical (UK)’s booth at the MEDICA trade fair, under EP 2 593 025 B1. The order of 18 November 2025 provided for the defendant to be heard on its confidentiality interests, but no representative logged into the case management system (CMS) despite the access code handed over on service (paragraphs 3 to 6).
Question
Must the Court delay disclosure of the expert’s description in order to hear, on confidentiality, a defendant that has appointed no representative in the CMS?
Decision
The defendant can only be heard through the CMS. Service on paper, with translations, would cause unreasonable delay (paragraph 8). Informed on service of the order and the access code, the defendant had enough time to appoint a representative. Its failure to do so cannot prejudice the applicant (paragraph 9). The judge orders disclosure of the unredacted description and annexes, lifts the confidentiality obligation vis-à-vis the applicant and starts the time limit for the main action (31 calendar days or 20 working days) from upload of the order to the CMS (paragraphs 10 and 11).
Key points for practice
- A defendant that receives a CMS access code when the measures are executed must promptly appoint a representative, failing which it loses the chance to assert its confidentiality interests.
- Practical point: for the applicant, the defendant’s inaction speeds up access to the expert’s description and starts the time limit for the main action from upload of the order.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 60(8)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 194, 196, 197, 198.1 and 199
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Order to preserve evidence (UPC).
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Evidence Before Argument: The French Weapon Foreign Patent Holders Forget (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantLiNA Medical AG5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantSchultz Medical (UK) Ltd.2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 18 November 2025 LiNA Medical v Schultz Medical (UK) (CFI, 18 November 2025) Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 · UPC_CFI_1598/2025
La division locale de Düsseldorf ordonne sans audition l'inspection du morcellateur MORCELLIX exposé au MEDICA, avec remise d'un échantillon à un expert ou, à défaut, saisie, sans garantie, la contrefaçon étant rendue vraisemblable par l'examen d'un produit identique acquis hors du territoire.
- 19 December 2025 LiNA Medical v Schultz Medical (UK) (CFI, 19 December 2025) Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 · UPC_CFI_1598/2025
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La description de l'expert est communiquée intégralement au demandeur, la défenderesse n'ayant désigné aucun représentant dans le CMS malgré le code d'accès reçu lors de la signification, ce qui l'empêche de faire valoir ses intérêts de confidentialité.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 593 025 B1mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- LiNA Medical v Schultz Medical (UK) (CFI, 18 November 2025) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 593 025 B1 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 3 other decision(s): LiNA Medical v Tonglu Qianyan Medtech (CFI, 19 December 2025) · LiNA Medical v Tonglu Qianyan Medtech (CFI, 18 November 2025) · LiNA Medical v Schultz Medical (UK) (CFI, 18 November 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.