Opens in a new tab

BARCO v YEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (CFI, 4 December 2025)

Date4 December 2025
CourtCFI
DivisionBrussels (BE) Local Division
Type of actionInfringement Action
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_806/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_806/2025
PartiesBARCO NV v. 1. YEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd. and / 2. YEALINK (EUROPE) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY BV

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_806/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 26 November 2025 Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology (CFI, 26 November 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_806/2025

    Le juge-rapporteur sursoit à statuer sur l’exception préliminaire d’incompétence territoriale de Yealink jusqu’à l’arrêt de la cour d’appel dans l’affaire UPC_CoA_317/2025 et fixe le calendrier des observations.

  2. 4 December 2025 BARCO v YEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (CFI, 4 December 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_806/2025
  3. 17 August 2026 Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network (CFI, UPC_CFI_806/2025, 17 August 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_806/2025

    La demande de Barco tendant à introduire une sixième requête subsidiaire, présentée le 4 août 2026, est rejetée faute de diligence et en raison de la gêne causée à Yealink. L'autorisation de faire appel est accordée.

  4. 14 September 2026 Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network (CFI, UPC_CFI_806/2025, 14 September 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_806/2025

    La division locale de Bruxelles fixe la valeur de l'action en contrefaçon à 1 million d'euros et celle de la demande reconventionnelle en nullité à 1,5 million d'euros, et organise l'audience selon l'issue de l'appel pendant.

  5. 19 October 2026 Barco v Yealink (CFI, 19 October 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_806/2025

    Le juge rapporteur clôt la phase intermédiaire sans nouvel échange écrit, fixe la valeur du litige à 2 500 000 euros et maintient l'audience au 3 novembre 2026 après l'arrêt de la cour d'appel du 16 octobre 2026.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
L’incident d’exception préliminaire est clos et les demandes de Yealink sont rejetées à la suite du retrait de l’exception.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 3 732 827
Method and system for making functional devices availalble to participants of meetings
recorded proprietor: Barco NV		Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 12 other decision(s): Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network (CFI, UPC_CFI_806/2025, 17 August 202 · YEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK v BARCO (CFI, 7 May 2026) · Yealink (Xiamen) Network v Barco (CoA, 28 November 2025) · Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology (CFI, 26 November 2025) · Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology (CoA, 21 August 2025) · Barco v Yealink (CoA, 14 August 2025) · Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology v Barco (CFI, 8 May 2025) · Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology (CoA, 17 April 2025)		not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet · European Patent Register
existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically)
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.