ILME GmbH Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft v PHOENIX CONTACT (CoA, 19 June 2025)

Date	19 June 2025
Court	CoA
Division	Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action	Application Rop 360
Registry reference	App_25965/2025 · ORD_26161/2025
Parties	ILME GmbH Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft, Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. S.p.A.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

No case number recorded in this record.

Parties

claimantILME GmbH Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft4 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantIndustria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. S.p.A.4 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Application Rop 360
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): L'appel, devenu sans objet après le désistement de l'action en contrefaçon consécutif à une transaction, est rejeté en application analogique de la règle 360, sans désistement d'appel ni décision sur les frais.
Appeal: Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance: Court of Appeal decision.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 602 692 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

PHOENIX CONTACT (CFI, 5 June 2025) cited in this record
Amazon Europe Core v Nokia Technologies (CoA, 22 April 2025) cited in this record
PHOENIX CONTACT v Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. (CFI, 10 February 2025) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 602 692`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 3 other decision(s): PHOENIX CONTACT v Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico (CFI, 5 June · PHOENIX CONTACT v Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. (CFI · HARTING Electric Stiftung v PHOENIX CONTACT (CFI, 20 December 2024)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.