FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, UPC_CFI_355/2023, ORD_7103/2024, 21 February 2024, doc. 2)

Date	21 February 2024
Court	CFI
Division	Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_355/2023
Registry reference	App_6926/2024 · ORD_7103/2024 · UPC_CFI_355/2023
Parties	FUJIFILM Corporation v. Kodak GmbH a. o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

21 February 2024 : FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, UPC_CFI_355/2023, ORD_7103/2024, 21 February 2024) App_6926/2024 · ORD_7103/2024 · UPC_CFI_355/2023
27 March 2024 : FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, 27 March 2024) App_6761/2024 · ORD_7096/2024 · UPC_CFI_355/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_355/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantFUJIFILM Corporationnormalised name: Fujifilm Corporation37 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantKodak GmbH a. o2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

21 February 2024 FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, UPC_CFI_355/2023, ORD_7103/2024, 21 February 2024) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_355/2023
Le délai de dépôt des demandes reconventionnelles en nullité de Kodak est prorogé rétroactivement au 7 février 2024 et la demande de décision par défaut de FUJIFILM est rejetée.
21 February 2024 FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, UPC_CFI_355/2023, ORD_7103/2024, 21 February 2024, doc. 2) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_355/2023
27 March 2024 FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, 27 March 2024) Procedural Order · UPC_CFI_355/2023
L'accès aux informations confidentielles du mémoire en défense de Kodak est ouvert aux représentants, aux experts et à neuf salariés de FUJIFILM, dont six de façon différée. Les restrictions supplémentaires demandées sont rejetées.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, 27 March 2024) cited in this record
FUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, UPC_CFI_355/2023, ORD_7103/2024, 21 February 2024) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.