Here we are (at last), the UPC has opened its doors to claimants. Attorneys-at-Law before national Courts, like European patent attorneys, can now bear the new title of \u201cUCP Representative\u201d and thus exercise a new function of representative before UPC. This raises a number of questions for them.<\/p>\n
Like my colleagues, I have been consulted on the topic of possible actions before UPC for month now, sometimes recommending to go, sometimes not. In most cases, however, I have essentially questioned my clients\u2019 real interest in using the system. Here are a few thoughts resulting from this exercise.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Here we are (at last), the UPC has opened its doors to claimants. Attorneys-at-Law before national Courts, like European patent attorneys, can now bear the new title of \u201cUCP Representative\u201d and thus exercise a new function of representative before UPC. This raises a number of questions for them. Like my colleagues, I have been consulted […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brevets","category-jub"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n