The seizure, that French-style \u201cAnton Piller Order,\u201d but obtained in the blink of an eye, to such an extent that the whole world is still in awe; our Marilyn of French patent law has made her discreet entry into the JUB. It may come as a surprise to the reader that I use the expression \u201cseizure,\u201d when the UPCA text specifically provides for measures to preserve evidence. But never mind, I\u2019m not afraid of being branded an irreducible Gallic, I\u2019m used to it, and after all, \u201cseizure\u201d is a pot I fell into when I was \u201clittle.\u201d<\/p>\n
It must be admitted, however, that behind the new terms lies a procedure whose philosophy is diametrically opposed to that of French seizure. Indeed, evidence preservation measures (or seizure) before the new jurisdiction have raised and continue to raise questions, particularly, strangely enough, for those who, like yours truly, enjoy practicing it assiduously. I will therefore devote a series of posts to explaining this new system (UPC \u201cseizure\u201d Papers Series), starting today with some comments on the texts.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The \u201csaisie-contrefa\u00e7on\u201c, that French-style \u201cAnton Piller Order\u201d, but obtained in the blink of an eye, to such an extent that the whole world is still in awe; our Marylin of French patent law has made her discreet entry into the JUB. It may come as a surprise to the reader that I use the expression […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,7,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brevets","category-jub","category-saisie-contrefacon"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n